M.E. v. France
Article 3Article 8ViolationREF 50094/17
France · 2023 · Gender Identity

M.E. v. France

Summary

The Court examined whether removal of an LGBTQ+ applicant to their country of origin would expose them to a real risk of ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR.

Facts

The applicant claimed to have suffered persecution because of their identity in the country of origin, and sought international protection in France. National authorities rejected the claim and issued a removal decision.

Court's Reasoning

The Court assessed country-of-origin information on anti-LGBTQ+ violence together with the applicant's individual profile, and reiterated that authorities must not expect applicants to conceal their sexual orientation or gender identity to avoid persecution.

Why It Matters

Reaffirms the non-refoulement obligation of Contracting States in relation to LGBTQ+ applicants and rejects the 'discretion' requirement.

#non-refoulement#gender identity#asylum#removal
This is information, not legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your specific case.